Add 'Prevagen Review: does This Memory Supplement Really Work?'

Prevagen-Review%3A-does-This-Memory-Supplement-Really-Work%3F.md

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+<br>Apoaequorin is a protein present in jellyfish. It is the lively ingredient in Prevagen,  [Mind Guard testimonials](https://rentry.co/69925-brain-supplements-boost-your-cognitive-function) and  [Mind Guard testimonials](http://story119.com/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free&wr_id=1161334) the focus of all of the "science" carried out by Quincy Bioscience "researchers". In keeping with the Prevagen web site,  [Mind Guard testimonials](https://gitlab.grupolambda.info.bo/domingamuntz89/mind-guard-cognitive-support2756/-/issues/4) apoaequorin has been "clinically proven to be protected and enhance memory and help [natural brain health supplement](https://gitea.cybs.io/camillalcr278/camilla2006/wiki/9-Impressive-Benefits-of-Cold-Brew-Coffee-%28Plus-Methods-to-Make-It%29) function". What clinical trial are they speaking about right here? Quincy Bioscience is right here referring to the so-known as "Madison Study". This was an in-home clinical trial,  [Mind Guard testimonials](https://gitlab.ngser.com/adolphcazneaux/4540540/-/issues/2) carried out by Quincy Bioscience researchers, to find out the effect of apoaequorin on scores in various reminiscence assessments. Quincy Bioscience claims that this "Madison Study" showed a significant enchancment in memory perform in folks given apoaequorin after ninety days. But in case you delve into the data, the results should not quite what they seem. Instantly in the Madison Study report,  [Mind Guard testimonials](https://wiki.ageofspace.net/doku.php?id=empathogens_as_conceived_by_chatgpt) the "researchers" state that there was no statistically significant distinction in reminiscence function between all treatment teams and placebo over the 90 days. However, the "scientists" did discover a sample int he knowledge.<br>
+
+<br>"While no statistically vital results had been noticed over the complete examine inhabitants, there have been statistically vital results in the AD8 0-1 and AD8 0-2 subgroups. This sounds promising, until you see the "statistically significant" improvements in reminiscence operate they’re talking about. At Day 60 of the trial, the most effective responding group to apoaequorin showed a 7% improvement in ISL scores (ISL is a word memorization check used to measure reminiscence loss). At the identical point within the trial, the placebo management group confirmed a 4% enchancment. THAT’S A 3% EDGE IN FAVOR OF APOAEQUORIN! That is in the group of strongest responders. I can undergo the other memory checks used by Quincy Bioscience and inform the identical story